Now, affected troops will be able to completely recover noneconomic damages.

"The amendments to the regulation will allow some service members to receive compensation for noneconomic damages that they would not have been able to receive under the current regulation," DoD officials wrote in the rule. "The amendments afford some service members additional compensation."

In October, the Pentagon raised the amount of money troops could receive for noneconomic damages from $600,000 to $750,000. Economic damages, such as loss of wages as a result of malpractice, remain uncapped.

According to the Defense Department, offsets were applied to just four claims that were decided in 2021 and 2022. (The DoD based its rule only on the information available early in the creation of the program.) In half of the claims, the economic damages were larger than the offsets so the new rule would not have changed the payout. But it would have affected the remaining two, with $200,000 more being allotted in one case and $100,000 more to the other.

[RELATED: DoD’s New Electronic Health Records System Gets Low Scores From Providers]

In October, Pentagon spokesman Maj. Gen. Pat Ryder said that currently pending claims affected by the rule will be adjudicated once the rule is published.

Until 2021, service members were not allowed to file claims for medical malpractice or sue the Defense Department over injuries or illnesses that occur while on active duty. Troops still aren't allowed to file lawsuits over medical malpractice under the Feres Doctrine, set by a 1950 Supreme Court decision that protected the military and its officials from liability for combat- related injuries, although family members may file claims and lawsuits in civil court under the Federal Tort Claims Act.

Legislation passed in 2019 allowed service members to file claims for injuries over malpractice at military treatment facilities. Army Master Sgt. Richard Stayskal, for whom the legislation was named, was denied the claim he filed against Womack Army Medical Center at Fort Liberty, North Carolina -- then Fort Bragg -- which did not follow up on a suspicious lump. He was later diagnosed with terminal lung cancer.

[RELATED: Military Pharmacies Resume Regular Operations After Cyberattack]

Stayskal and his wife filed claims for $20 million for pain and suffering. His subsequent appeal also was denied. His attorney, Natalie Khawam of Whistleblower Law Firm in Tampa, said Thursday that her client was told that the Army had "breached standard of care" but did not commit malpractice.

Stayskal currently has no recourse to appeal his ruling. Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., introduced a bill last year that would allow service members to take their medical malpractice claims to federal court. The bill has 27 sponsors but has not been considered by the House Judiciary Committee.

"People have the right to sue if they are victims of malpractice, except for service members. It's time to stop treating them like second-class citizens. It's got to stop," Khawam said during an interview Thursday.